Blog Post #8

I think for a book to be non-fiction it has to be at least 90% true. If some things are altered or changed I think that is ok as long as it does not completely make up a story. If the story is good and the majority of the story is true then I think the book should still be considered non-fiction and not critisized. Honestly I agree with what David Shields says about no need for a line between genres. I dont think it matters at all and that what really matters is the quality of the story.